
President Donald Trump has introduced a new initiative, “Project Homecoming,” aimed at encouraging undocumented immigrants to voluntarily leave the United States. This program offers a $1,000 “exit bonus” and free, government-funded flights to their home countries. The initiative is facilitated through a mobile application called CBP Home, which allows users to schedule their departure and access travel assistance.

Key Features of Project Homecoming:
- Financial Incentives: Eligible individuals receive a $1,000 stipend upon confirmed departure.
- Travel Assistance: The program covers the cost of flights to the individual’s home country, excluding the U.S.
- Use of CBP Home App: Formerly known as CBP One, this app has been repurposed to facilitate self-deportation processes, including scheduling departures and accessing support services.
- Deprioritized Enforcement: Participants are deprioritized for arrest and detention during the self-deportation process, provided they demonstrate progress toward leaving.
Government Justification and Goals:
The administration argues that voluntary departures are more cost-effective than formal deportations, which average over $17,000 per individual. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stated that self-deportation offers a dignified exit and the potential for legal reentry in the future.

Criticism and Concerns:
Immigration advocates caution that the program may lead individuals to forgo legal protections and relief options, such as asylum or family-based petitions. They also warn that using the CBP Home app involves sharing personal information, which could be used in future enforcement actions.
Implementation and Outreach:
To promote the program, the administration has launched a $200 million media campaign titled “Stay Out and Leave Now,” featuring advertisements and messages from officials urging undocumented immigrants to depart voluntarily.
Conclusion:
Project Homecoming represents a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy, emphasizing voluntary departure over enforced removal. While the administration highlights cost savings and potential benefits for participants, critics argue that the program may undermine legal rights and due process for vulnerable populations.